Templates

Managing Risks and Reputation in fundraising: Arts, Culture and Heritage

Template for creating a Fundraising or Gift Acceptance Policy

A suggested template for creating a fundraising or gift acceptance policy for mid-scale to large-scale cultural organisations follows below. The template is illustrative only and organisations may wish to develop a fundraising or gift acceptance policy using some, or all, of its headings.

Each section of the template builds on the more detailed discussion above, which can be used to add the relevant detail to the headings for your organisational context.

Fundraising or gift acceptance policies for mid-scale to large-scale cultural organisations will usually be structured and overseen by formal committees and the Board of trustees and will be accompanied by adequate due diligence and associated risk scoring.

Organisations should also be mindful that declining a donation may create reputational or relationship risks of its own. Clear policies, consistent decision-making and thoughtful communication can help ensure that decisions to refuse support are understood as governance decisions rather than as reactive or inconsistent responses.

Fundraising or Gift Acceptance Policy Template for mid-scale and large-scale cultural organisations
  • Introduction

    Outline details about your organisation, its work and purpose and explain how this policy supports your organisation to fundraise

  • Purpose

    Set out how the organisation will raise funds, manage reputational risk, and comply with trustee duties e.g.:

    Trustees are legally responsible for overseeing fundraising and this policy aligns with legal obligations set out by the Charity Commission of England and Wales and by the Fundraising Regulator.

    Outline where the responsibility for fundraising sits (i.e. with the Board of trustees and a Fundraising Committee).

    Outline your approach to acceptance of funds, for example:

    “In line with Charity Commission guidance, the charity’s starting point is to accept donations. However, trustees may refuse or return a donation where they reasonably believe that accepting it would not be in the charity’s best interests, having considered public benefit, reputational risk, legal compliance, proportionality, and the availability of mitigating actions. All such decisions will be documented.”

  • Scope

    The scope of the policy will depend on the fundraising activities of your organisation. It may include:

    Details of the types of fundraising that the policy covers (e.g.,trusts and grants, individuals) The policy should also be clear about what it does not include or relate to (e.g. wider aspects of operations or investment)

  • Guiding Principles

    • Outline your approach to fundraising and artistic / curatorial independence here.
    • Detail that trustees have established a fundraising (gift acceptance) policy so that staff and partners share a common understanding about approaches to fundraising.
    • Outline the organisation’s approach to risk identification when developing fundraising approaches.
    • Provide clarity about your approach to working with donors and that fundraising activities must treat donors fairly and with respect.
    • Detail how the organisation protects artistic / curatorial independence and that sponsors, partners and third parties do not determine artistic content.

    In this section, you should outline any major issues that your organisation has identified as part of the development of this policy.

    For example, you may want to say that the key issues considered when developing this policy were:

    • Compliance with charity law and best practice in fundraising
    • Outline governance of the policy, as well as delegated responsibility for day-to-day management of the policy
    • Make reference to any other organisational policies that are relevant, for example, an organisational acquisition or loans policy for artworks.

     

  • Due Diligence and Risk Assesment

    Make it clear how the organisation will carry out due-diligence checks on donors and partners and identify associated risks. Be clear about the red lines that you have identified (i.e.funding you will not accept).

    Integrate alignment of the policy with any associated Due Diligence frameworks that your organisation has in place.

    Make it clear what your approach to due diligence is, for example, we will:

    • Conduct proportionate checks on the financial and reputational background of donors before accepting gifts
    • Verify the source and nature of donations
    • Ensure that donors are not subject to sanctions or restrictions
    • Document risks, mitigation actions, and decisions in writing

    Outline where enhanced due diligence will be required, for example:

    • High-value gifts
    • Complex corporate structures
    • Overseas donors
    • Politically exposed persons
    • Gifts carrying conditions

    If there are other codes of good practice your organisation adheres to, outline them here e.g. General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR).

  • Acceptance and Refusal of Donations

    The organisation will maintain written criteria for assessing that funding is:

    • Compatible with organisational purpose and stated public commitments
    • Likely stakeholder perception of the relationship including but not limited to trustees, staff, audiences, artists, partners (adapt as required)

    The organisation’s fundraising policy should describe its approach to due diligence, risk assessment and decision-making, including any thresholds for escalation to senior leadership or trustees. It should also set out the standards and expectations that apply to different income streams.

    Consistent with Charity Commission guidance, trustees should ensure that decisions relating to the acceptance, refusal or return of funding are informed, proportionate and made in the charity’s best interests. Decisions outside routine practice should be documented, including the rationale for the decision. This section could include reference to areas such as:

    • Accurate Representation: We will accurately represent our organisation and the intended use of donated funds. We will be truthful, respectful and concise in communications.
    • Informed Consent: We will ensure that donors provide informed consent for their contributions and understand how their funds will be used – consent is defined as “freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous indication of the individual’s wishes.”
    • Avoiding Pressure: We will avoid placing undue pressure on potential donors and respect their decision to donate or not.

    Organisations could also consider reference, where relevant, to adhering to codes of good practice such as:

    The Code of Fundraising Practice from the Fundraising Regulator

    ³

  • Governance Structure

    Outline how the organisation will structure its oversight of the policy, for example, it will:

    • Establish clear lines of responsibility for scrutinising proposed donations
    • Create a committee or delegate authority to key individuals to review reputational risks

    Be clear that trustees will ensure that necessary risk assessments are carried out and that the organisation will remain alert to any suspicious or unusual fundraising activity.

  • Reputational Risk

    Ensure that you outline your awareness that activities and partnerships can generate reputational risk for your organisations and its funders. As such, the organisation will:

    • Evaluate public perception of its funding sources
    • Consider alignment with funding sources that reflect its organisational purpose and stated public commitments
    • Review fundraising decision-making at board level

    Outline any circumstances where you may choose to decline funding and the associated decision-making process for doing so, for example, declining funding from sources involved in illegal or unethical activities. Outline that you may pause or decline a partnership or funding whilst you review the associated risks involved.

  • Monitoring and Review

    Add some information here about how you will monitor the policy. Be specific. Include who will monitor the policy and how often.

    For example:

    • We will regularly monitor and evaluate our fundraising practices to ensure compliance with this policy.
    • We will undertake monitoring annually with trustees and the Senior Management Team on X date.
    • The policy will be reviewed annually and updated after any major funding decision, or as required to remain effective and relevant.

     

  • Transparency

    Be clearthat you will communicate openly aboutthe organisation’s fundraising practices to maintain public trust and to comply with sector standards

  • Communication and Training

    It is worth adding that you have shared the policy with the staff, trustee, and volunteer teams and have provided some training in relation to its implementation. You could say:

    • This policy will be communicated to all staff, volunteers, trustees, artists and relevant stakeholders.
    • Training will be provided to ensure understanding and compliance.

    Concerns about how this policy has been applied can be raised via (complaints email / process).

    We will respond within (x) working days.

  • Approval and Implementation

    This Fundraising Policy has been approved by the Board of trustees of (Organisation Name) and is effective from (Date).

    All staff, volunteers, and trustees are expected to adhere to this policy.

    Signed: (Chair of the Board of trustees)

    Date:

    Revised and Updated:

Fundraising or Gift Acceptance Policy Template for small-scale and grassroots cultural organisations

For smaller-scale and grassroots cultural organisations or non-registered charities, the following framework to create a fundraising or gift acceptance policy is suggested.

Small-scale and grassroots cultural organisations will usually adopt a risk-based approach to fundraising which will be overseen by trustees or leadership committees.

This template can be adapted for your organisational context, including the likely risks related to fundraising and to cover different scenarios as they may occur.

  • Introduction

    Outline details about your organisation, its work and purpose and explain how this policy supports your organisation to fundraise.

  • Purpose

    Detail the purpose of the policy, for example, to ensure that funds are raised legally, responsibly, and in line with trustee responsibilities.

  • Due Diligence

    Make it clear how you will conduct due diligence checks and that your approach will depend on the size of funding, source and individual circumstances. Detail your approach here.

    Explain any red lines and your decision method/s for accepting or declining funding.

    If appropriate, outline how the organisation protects artistic / curatorial independence.

  • Donor Checks

    Outline your approach to due diligence and any additional due diligence that you will undertake on funding sources when needed, for example, when:

    • A donation is unusually large
    • A donor requests anonymity
    • Funds originate from overseas
    • Conditions are attached

    Such checks could include:

    • Confirming donor identity
    • Understanding the source of funds
    • Checking for sanctions
    • Recording decisions

    Be clear that you may pause or decline a partnership or funding whilst your organisation reviews the associated risks involved.

  • Reputational Alignment

    Make it clear that the organisation will accept support only from donors whose activities align with its organisational purpose and stated public commitments.

    Outline here what best practice means for your organisation against the different income streams that you are seeking, including how you will treat donors and respond to their wishes.

  • Refusing Donations

    Detail that refusals of funding are exceptional and will be clearly documented with reasons given.

  • Trustee or Leadership Team Oversight

    Be clear that trustees (for charities) remain legally responsible for fundraising and will ensure they can justify their approach to good practice.

    Outline your structure for leadership oversight of the policy if your organisation is not a charity.

  • Communication

    The policy will be shared with staff, freelancers and visiting artists (adapt accordingly).

    Concerns about how this policy has been applied can be raised via (complaints email / process). We will respond within (x) working days.

  • Review

    This policy will be reviewed annually by the trustees and after any majorfunding decision and will be updated as required to remain effective and relevant

  • Approval and Implementation

    This policy has been approved by the Board of trustees of (OrganisationName) and is effective from (Date). All staff, volunteers, and trustees are expected to adhere to this policy.

    Signed: (Chair of the Board of trustees or designated leadership member)

    Date:

    Revised and Updated:

Testing and communicating your fundraising or gift acceptance policy

Testing the policy

Organisations can test their fundraising or gift acceptance policies through scenario planning via test cases. For example:

  • A business sponsor
  • A high-profile donor
  • A partnership that might come with conditions (branding / programming requests)

Exploring different test cases can support revision of the policy and simplification where required.

Communicating the policy

Organisations might assess how they will handle external communications around funding decisions and what support they may need, for example, specialist PR support if faced with media scrutiny for a particular funding decision, partnership or association. A response will need to be considered in conjunction with the relevant sponsor or funder.

Public interestin how cultural organisations are funded is legitimate and is likely to occur. The objective is to ensure that organisations respond with confidence, clarity and integrity, whilst protecting staff wellbeing, maintaining public trust, and demonstrating sound governance.

When responding publicly in the area of risk and reputation, arts organisations might be guided by four themes:

  1. We take decisions seriously
    Example: “We take all funding decisions seriously and consider them carefully through established governance and due diligence processes.”
  2. Our organisation requires sustainable funding
    Example: “As a charity, we rely on a mix of public, earned and private income to support our artistic, educational and community work.”
  3. Decisions are made in the organisation’s best interests
    Example: “Our trustees are responsible for ensuring that decisions support the organisation’s charitable purposes and long-term sustainability.”
  4. We respect public interest and dialogue
    Example: “We recognise that people hold strong views on these issues and we welcome thoughtful discussion.”

Sample statements might include the following information:

Short statement:

“We are aware of concerns raised regarding one of our funding partnerships. We take all such matters seriously. As a charity, we have clear governance processes for assessing funding relationships, including consideration of our charitable purposes, public benefit and reputational factors. We are reviewing the points raised and will respond further if appropriate.”

Fuller statement:

“As an independent charity, we rely on a range of income sources including public funding, earned income and private support to sustain our artistic, curatorial and public programme.

All significant funding relationships are considered through formal governance processes, including due diligence and trustee oversight where appropriate.

We recognise that views differ on these matters and respect the strength of feeling some have expressed. Our responsibility is to make decisions that support our charitable purpose, maintain public trust and ensure the long-term sustainability of the organisation.

We remain committed to transparency, artistic independence and serving our audiences and communities.”

Stakeholder Communications

Depending on the circumstances, organisations may wish to communicate directly with:

  • Staff
  • Trustees
  • Major supporters
  • Key artists / partners
  • Public funders
  • Local stakeholders where relevant

These instances also give chance for organisations to review and develop their processes in relation to risks and reputation, considering areas such as:

  • What happened?
  • Were our policies clear enough?
  • Were trustees sufficiently briefed?
  • Did staff feel supported?
  • Was due diligence proportionate?
  • Do we need stronger scenario planning?

Risk and Reputation linked to Corporate volunteering in cultural organisations

Corporate volunteering often appears low-risk as it is framed as ‘staff volunteering’ rather than fundraising or sponsorship. In practice, however, it can function as a corporate partnership benefit, ESG activity, relationship-building mechanism, or route into wider sponsorship, so it should be assessed within the same governance framework as other corporate support.

This is because stakeholders may perceive the charity as endorsing or legitimising the company and if the company’s activities conflict with the charity’s purpose and stated public commitments, the partnership may undermine credibility.

There is no specific Charity Commission guidance related solely to corporate volunteering, but trustees should apply the Commission’s wider principles of acting in the charity’s best interests, considering reputational impact, being properly informed, managing risk and documenting decisions.

How Corporate Volunteering should be assessed

Corporate volunteering should usually be assessed as an in-kind donation / partnership.

Trustees / senior staff should ask:

Strategic Value

  • Does this partnership advance our charitable purposes?
  • Will staff time spent to develop the partnership outweigh the benefit?

Reputational Considerations

  • Will stakeholders question the relationship?
  • Is there conflict with our organisational purpose or stated public commitments?
  • Could the company use our name / logo publicly?

Practical Delivery

  • Who supervises volunteers?
  • Health & safety?
  • Insurance?
  • Safeguarding checks?
  • Accessibility?

Equity / Inclusion

  • Is the volunteering meaningful?
  • Are stakeholders and beneficiaries comfortable with the arrangement?

Communications Control

  • Can the company publicly market the activity?
  • Must approval be sought for publicity?

Different types of corporate volunteering will carry different levels of risk, for example, a staff gardening day with no access to or involvement of beneficiaries, will likely be low risk, whereas volunteers working with vulnerable beneficiaries without controls may be considered high risk.

Recommended Policy Position for Cultural Organisations

As outline above, cultural organisations should treat corporate volunteering as partnership income in kind.

This means undertaking proportionate diligence on:

  • Who the company is
  • What the company wants
  • What the charity gains
  • What reputational signal is created

Include corporate volunteering inside your:

  • Gift Acceptance Policy
  • Partnerships Policy
  • Risk & Reputation Framework
  • Safeguarding Procedures
  • Brand / Logo Permissions Policy

Suggested wording:

Corporate volunteering offers can provide valuable support, skills and engagement opportunities. The organisation will assess such offers in line with charitable purpose, operational benefit, reputational considerations, safeguarding requirements, and public trust.

Corporate Volunteering Risk Assessment Template for Cultural Organisations

Purpose

The organisation welcomes appropriate corporate volunteering support where it advances our charitable purposes and delivers clear benefit. Offers will be assessed proportionately, taking account of operational value, reputational considerations, safeguarding requirements, and public trust.

Section 1: Basic Details

Organisation receiving support:

Corporate organisation:

Main contact at corporate:

Proposed activity:

☐ Team volunteering day
☐ Skills-based volunteering
☐ Mentoring / employability support
☐ Event support
☐ Community project delivery
☐ Premises / maintenance support
☐ Other

Proposed date(s):

Number of volunteers:

Location:

Internal lead officer:

Section 2: Strategic Benefit Assessment

How does this activity support our purpose or stated commitments?

☐ Supports charitable purpose directly
☐ Supports community engagement
☐ Supports learning / participation
☐ Supports organisational capacity
☐ Supports staff development
☐ Limited strategic relevance
☐ Unclear

Comments:

Estimated value to organisation:

Comments:

Section 3: Resource and Delivery Assessment

Staff time required to manage programme:

Comments:

Will supervision be required?

☐ Yes ☐ No

Are materials / equipment costs involved?

☐ Yes ☐ No

Could activity disrupt normal operations?

☐ Yes ☐ No

Net benefit after internal costs likely to be:

☐ Positive
☐ Neutral
☐ Negative / uncertain

Comments:

Section 4: Reputational Risk Assessment

Risk Threshold Guidance

Low Risk

Local employer, practical support, limited publicity, clear benefit.

Medium Risk

National brand, meaningful publicity, moderate scrutiny potential, some operational burden.

High Risk

Controversial sector, likely organised criticism, mission conflict, safeguarding complexity, reputational sensitivity.

Is the company associated with sectors likely to create scrutiny?

☐ Fossil fuels
☐ Gambling
☐ Tobacco
☐ Arms / defence
☐ Adult entertainment
☐ Extractives / environmental controversy
☐ Labour rights controversy
☐ No known concerns
☐ Other:

Could the relationship conflict with our organisational purpose or stated public commitments?

☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Possibly

Could staff, artists, audiences or communities challenge the partnership?

☐ Yes ☐ Possible ☐ Unlikely

Is the company likely to publicise the relationship prominently?

☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown

Overall reputational risk

☐ Low ☐ Medium ☐ High

Comments:

Section 5: Safeguarding and Conduct

Will volunteers interact with children or vulnerable adults or other beneficiaries?

☐ Yes ☐ No

DBS / safeguarding checks required?

☐ Yes ☐ No

Will volunteers require conduct briefing?

☐ Yes ☐ No

Accessibility / inclusion considerations identified?

☐ Yes ☐ No

Any known behaviour or culture concerns relating to company?

☐ Yes ☐ No

Comments:

Section 6: Communications and Brand Use

Can the company use our name / logo publicly?

☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ To be agreed

Is media coverage expected?

☐ Yes ☐ No

Is joint messaging required?

☐ Yes ☐ No

Is there risk of perceived endorsement?

☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Possible

Comments:

Section 7: Due Diligence Check

Basic checks completed:

☐ Website review
☐ Companies House / legal status review
☐ News / media search
☐ ESG/ controversy review
☐ Existing relationships known
☐ Internal stakeholder concerns checked

Comments:

Section 8: Overall Assessment

Summary of benefits

Summary of risks

Recommended decision

☐ Approve
☐ Approve with conditions
☐ Escalate for senior review
☐ Decline

Conditions (if applicable)

☐ No logo use without approval
☐ Safeguarding checks required
☐ Limited publicity
☐ Staff supervision required
☐ Review after pilot activity
☐ Other:

Comments:

Section 9: Authorisation

Completed by

Date

Approved by

Escalated to Trustee / Committee (if required)

☐ Yes ☐ No

Risk and Reputation linked to Venue and Room Hire in cultural organisations

Cultural Organisations can also encounter reputational risks in terms of earned income activities such as space and room hire.

It may be useful to develop a separate policy to support decision-making in this area.

  • Purpose of this Policy

    The organisation welcomes the use of its spaces by external individuals, groups and organisations where this supports our charitable purposes, public engagement, community access and financial sustainability.

    Income from venue hire can be an important part of our balanced funding model, helping to support artistic, educational and community activity.

    At the same time, venue and room hire arrangements may create operational, legal or reputational risks. This policy sets out a clear, fair and proportionate framework for assessing requests to hire or use our organisational spaces.

    The aim is to support confident decision-making, protect public trust, and ensure that use of our premises is consistent with our responsibilities as a charity / cultural organisation.

    Charitable arts organisations may also wish to reference that they are following Charity Commission guidance about events on a charity’s premises  (sections 10.10 and 10.11).

  • Scope

    This policy applies to (delete as required):

    • Room hire
    • Conference and meeting space hire
    • Corporate hospitality bookings
    • Private receptions and dinners
    • Filming and photography hire
    • Community use bookings
    • Ticketed external events
    • Fundraising events hosted by third parties
    • Political campaigning or advocacy events
    • Partner-led public programmes using ur spaces
    • Any other temporary external use of organisational premises
  • Guiding Principles

    When assessing bookings, the organisation will seek to balance:

    A Organisational Purpose and Public Benefit
    Whether the proposed use supports or is compatible with our artistic, educational, cultural or community purposes.

    B Financial Sustainability
    Whether the booking provides appropriate income or strategic value.

    C Safety and Operational Practicality
    Whether the event can be delivered safely and effectively.

    D Reputation and Public Trust
    Whether the booking may reasonably create reputational harm, undermine confidence, or create confusion about endorsement.

    E Fairness and Consistency
    Whether other bookings would be treated in a similar way.

  • Important Clarification

    Hiring a space does not automatically imply endorsement of the hirer’s views, products or activities.

    However ,the organisation recognises that public perception may differ, particularly where events are high-profile, politically sensitive, controversial, or heavily branded. For this reason, some bookings may require additional review.

  • Standard Booking Criteria

    All bookings will normally be assessed against(delete as required):

    • Legal compliance
    • Safety and licensing requirements
    • Capacity and staffing
    • Technical feasibility
    • Accessibility considerations
    • Financial viability
    • Alignment with venue rules and conditions of hire
  • Reputational Risk Assessment Criteria

    Additional review may be required where a booking involves one or more of the following:

    A Politically Sensitive or Campaigning Activity

    • Party political events
    • High-profile lobbying activity
    • Events relating to live geopolitical conflicts
    • Highly polarised public policy debates

    B Commercial or Sector Sensitivity
    Organisations associated with:

    • Fossil Fuels
    • Gambling
    • Tobacco
    • Arms / Defence
    • Adult entertainment
    • Significant environmental controversy
    • Serious labour or governance concerns

    C Risk of Public Disorder or Protest

    • Strong likelihood of organised protest
    • Credible security concerns
    • Significant disruption to audiences or staff

    D Conflict With Organisational Purpose

    Where the proposed event appears materially inconsistent with the organisation’s charitable purposes, or stated commitments.

    E Brand / Endorsement Risk

    Where marketing may imply sponsorship, partnership or endorsement by the organisation.

  • Decision-Making Levels

    Low-Risk Bookings

    Routine commercial or community hires may be approved by delegated staff under standard procedures.

    Medium-Risk Bookings

    Bookings with some sensitivity should be reviewed by senior management.

    High-Risk Bookings

    Bookings with significant reputational, legal, safeguarding or security implications should be escalated to senior leadership and, where appropriate, trustees or a designated committee.

  • Factors Considered in Higher-Risk Cases

    The organisation may consider the:

    • Nature and purpose of the event
    • Identity and track record of hirer
    • Whether views are lawful
    • Likelihood and scale of disruption
    • Impact on staff, artists, audiences and communities
    • Potential confusion about endorsement
    • Income and strategic value
    • Whether mitigations can reduce risk
    • Duties relating to freedom of expression, equality and charity law (where relevant)
  • Conditions of Hire

    The organisation may approve bookings subject to conditions, including:

    • Clear disclaimer in reference to endorsement
    • Approval of marketing materials using venue name / logo
    • Security requirements at hirer cost
    • Behaviour and conduct standards
    • Insurance requirements
    • Capacity limits
    • Stewarding obligations
    • Restrictions on filming or publicity
    • Compliance with safeguarding procedures
    • Payment in advance
  • Grounds for Declining a Booking

    A booking may be declined where:

    • It would be unlawful
    • Safety risks cannot be managed
    • It is operationally unfeasible
    • It presents disproportionate reputational risk
    • It is likely to seriously undermine public trust
    • It materially conflicts with our organisation’s charitable purposes
    • Hirer refuses reasonable conditions
    • There is a credible risk of harassment, hate speech or serious disruption

    Declining a booking does not imply judgement on all views of the hirer; it reflects the organisation’s responsibility to manage its own duties and risks.

  • Political Neutrality and Public Debate

    As a cultural organisation, we may host a wide range oflawful views, debates and discussions. We are notrequired to agree with all participants.

    However, we are also not obliged to host every request, particularly where risks are disproportionate orthe eventis inconsistent with ourresponsibilities.

  • Communications and Public Statements

    Where a booking may attract scrutiny, the organisation may:

    • Prepare holding statements
    • Clarify the nature of the hire arrangement
    • Explain that venue hire does not equal endorsement
    • Explain the decision-making process
    • Communicate directly with stakeholders where appropriate

    Only authorised spokespeople may comment publicly.

  • Record Keeping

    For medium and high-risk bookings, the organisation will retain records of:

    • Request details
    • Risk assessment
    • Decision rationale
    • Approvals
    • Conditions imposed
    • Any incidents arising
  • Review and Appeals

    The organisation may review decisions where new information emerges.

    Unsuccessful applicants may request reconsideration where material facts were not previously available.

  • Equality, Inclusion and Respect

    The organisation is committed to lawful equality, dignity and respectful treatment. Decisions will not be based on protected characteristics, but may consider behaviour, conduct, legality, and impact.

  • Suggested Internal Risk Traffic Light

    Green

    Routine booking with no significant concerns.

    Amber

    Potential sensitivity requiring seniorreview.

    Red

    High-profile controversy, serious protestrisk, legal complexity or major brand implications.

  • Example Disclaimer for External Events

    This event is independently organised by the hirer. Venue hire does not imply endorsement of the views, products or activities of the organisers by (Organisation Name).

  • Final Principle

    The organisation seeks to be open, welcoming and financially sustainable, whilst exercising responsible stewardship of its spaces, reputation and public trust. Decisions will be made thoughtfully, proportionately and consistently.